Indigenous leaders in the states of Pará and Amapá evaluated the indigenous movement in the region and decided to launch a process for reorganizing the movement. Representatives of 20 peoples convened on November 4-7 in Ananindeua, state of Pará, will now return to their villages and discuss the need to reorganize the indigenous movement in their communities until January. The communities will appoint representatives for structuring the regional movement. They also have plans to hold an indigenous assembly in 2005.

“The priorities of the movement include the right to the land, education, health, and income generation for the communities,” said Luiz Xipaya, who attended the Meeting.

According to Claudemir Monteiro, Cimi coordinator in the Regional North 2 area, indigenous peoples in the states of Pará and Amapá have a structured movement in their villages but felt the need to get better organized regionally to deal with specific issues related to the indigenous policy more appropriately. “The Meeting was held because of the concerns of Cimi’s Regional North 2 office with structuring the indigenous movement, as nothing was being done for that purpose regionally.”

During the Meeting, issues related to indigenous lands were discussed, with emphasis on the need to identify indigenous lands and on a proposal for reducing the Cachoeira Seca land of the Arara people, after the Baú land of the Kayapó people in the state of Pará was reduced.

Other topic addressed at the meeting was the health policy model for indigenous people, which is based on agreements between indigenous associations and the National Health Foundation (Funasa). The management of the agreements creates new power structures in the community which affect social relations amongst indigenous peoples and generate internal disputes. Jecinaldo Saterê-Mawé, general coordinator of the Coordinating Board of the Indigenous Organizations of the Brazilian Amazon (Coiab), attended the seminar and criticized the agreements signed by indigenous associations. According to him, “these organizations should play the role of inspectors and social controllers of the actions of public authorities. When they enter into agreements, this role is largely jeopardized.”

The assistance provided to indigenous people living in cities was also discussed in the Meeting. According to Luiz Xipaya, there are about 3,000 indigenous people in Altamira who are not allowed to be treated in hospitals because Funasa only has agreements to provide health care to indigenous people in their villages. “They are not in the city by chance. They were expelled from their lands or brought to the city, and the law ensures that they are entitled to health care wherever they are,” the leader said.

The indigenous people mentioned that resistant peoples are also entitled to health care. They also want Funai to begin to demarcate their territories. 

Resistant peoples are those which resumed their ethnic identity. In the state of Pará, they are mainly concentrated in the region of Santarém. The Borari, Cara Preta, Tupinambá, Arara Vermelha, Maytapú, Tupaiú and Tapajó resistant peoples attended the Meeting.

Interministerial Group FOR THE Indigenous Policy is set up

The Interministerial Working Group for the Indigenous Policy (GTI) was officially set up on November 9. The Group was set up to “define, after consulting representative organizations of indigenous peoples, priority actions to be addressed by the governmental policy in this area and monitor their implementation,” according to the respective administrative ruling published in the Official Gazette.

Cimi challenged this decision because the Group does not involve representatives of indigenous peoples and organizations in the actual formulation of the indigenous policy.

Those more directly affected by the indigenous policy will only be consulted in relation to an Action Plan already prepared by the Working Group for Indigenous Policies of the Social Policy Chamber of the Governmental Council, which will also address topics defined by the Foreign Affairs and National Defense Chamber of the Governmental Council. This Chamber is mostly made up of military and in 2003 it had the “human rights” and “indigenous populations” topics added to other issues it deals with.

The GTI which was set up this week is composed of representatives of the ministries of Health, Education, Defense, Social Development and Fight Against Hunger, Environment, Mines and Energy, and Planning, Budget and Management, and also of representatives of the Civil House, General Secretariat of the Office of the President of the Republic, the Institutional Security Office of the Presidency of the Republic, the Special Advisory Office of the Presidency of the Republic, and the Special Secretariat for Promoting Racial Equity of the Presidency of the Republic.

In Cimi’s opinion, the Government is clearly not interested in fulfilling one of its main programmatic commitments in relation to indigenous peoples: the commitment to respect the right of these peoples, their communities and organizations to participate in decisions on issues affecting them, particularly in the formulation of the indigenous policy. This right is one of the main pillars of Convention 169 of the International Labor Organization (ILO), which the Brazilian Executive Branch promulgated on April 19 of this year. Considering that it has disregarding commitments made in relation to indigenous peoples during the presidential campaign on other occasions, it looks like the Lula administration will be the first party to violate the terms of the Convention.

Brasília, 11 November 2004.

O Ministério Público Federal deverá recorrer no Tribunal Regional Federal, pedindo o cancelamento da sentença por erro de julgamento, com o argumento de que a decisão do Júri foi contrária às provas apresentadas no processo.

Estava sendo julgado Sebastião Gonçalves Bastos, de 60 anos. Segundo denúncias dos Zoró e da Funai na época do crime, 20 homens participaram do assassinato. Seis deles foram denunciados, dois faleceram e 4 foram presos. Este foi o primeiro acusado julgado. Os outros três acusados estariam foragidos, mas vivendo na região.

Em 1988, na região onde ocorreu o assassinato, os maiores conflitos se deviam à retirada de madeiras e à grilagem de terras indígenas. 

De acordo com a indigenista Maria Inês Hargreaves, que acompanhou o julgamento, há erros desde o início do processo. O laudo de morte de Suruí Yaminé, por exemplo, atesta que não foi possível determinar a causa da morte. Segundo o site 24 horas news, de Cuiabá, MT, não houve materialidade do crime porque nenhum laudo provou que o corpo carbonizado encontrado mais tarde realmente era o de Yaminerá Suruí.

A indigenista conta que foi forte a indignação e o sentimento de injustiça que ficaram entre os Suruí, que também assistiram ao julgamento. Os índios voltaram para Rondônia no memso ônibus em que estava o acusado.

REORGANISATION DER INDIGENEN BEWEGUNG IN PARÁ UND AMAPÁ